Sprawowanie opieki nad dzieckiem w stanie Minesota i w Polsce. Koncepcja “nadrzędnego interesu dziecka” – analiza porównawcza

In an era of shaky familial relations, child custody and the principles of the best interest of the child have emerged with more strength and fortified protections than ever before. With the growing divorce rates, children remain the most vulnerable parties, thereby making them prone to some of the more damaging consequences of family dissolution. When analyzing child custody/protection laws around the globe, there are clear differences as to the enactment and enforcement of certain protections for children. This paper will explore the differences and similarities between Poland and the United States’ (specifically, Minnesota) best interest factors. Additionally, this paper will aim to find a common ground between the common law and civil law regulations in place in both Minnesota and Poland.mcudowska@wp.plMaria Cudowska – doktorantka w Zakładzie Prawa Handlowego, Katedra Prawa Cywilnego Wydziału Prawa Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.Maria Cudowska – PhD Candidate at the Institute of Commercial Law, Department of Civil Law, Faculty of Law, University of Bialystok.Uniwersytet w BiałymstokuAbrams D.E., Cahn N.R., Ross C.J., Meyer D.D., Contemporary Family Law, Hardcover 2009.Application no. 78296/11 Karolina NADOLSKA and Bronek LOPEZ NADOLSKA against Poland.Bailey A.M., Prioritizin Child Safety as the Prime Best – Interest Factor, “FamLQ” vol. 47.Blair D.M., Weiner M.H., Resolving Parental Custody Disputes – A Comparative Exploration, “Family L.Q.” 2005, vol. 39.Boulette M.P., A Practioner’s Guide To Minnesota’s New Best Interest Factors, 9 Wm. Mitchell J. L. & Prac.Gaskill v. Gaskill, 936 S.W.2d 626 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).Hague Conference on Private International Law, Hague Convention on the Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption, 29 May 1993.Hains v. Hains, 36 So. 3d 289, (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010).Mączyński A., Mączyńska J., National Rerport: Poland, available at: http://cefl online.net/wp-content/uploads/Poland-Parental-Responsibilities.pdf.MINN. STAT. § 518.17, (2016).Raleigh v. Watkins, 97 Mich. App. 258, 293 N.W.2d 789 (1980).Rexine v. Rexine 2015 WL 6442560 (Min. Ct. Appeals 2016).Stojanowska W., Dobro dziecka w aspekcie sprawowanej nad nim władzy rodzicielskiej, “Studia nad Rodziną” 2000, 4 no 1(6).UN General Assembly, Convention on the Rights of the Child, 20 November 1989, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1577.Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act, 9A U.L.A. 91 (1979).22313314